Each step is gated, and each one is recorded. A review that cannot show how it reached its conclusion is of little use to the organisation relying on it.
Evidentiary review is cumulative: a mapping is only meaningful once ingestion is complete, and a consistency control is only meaningful once the mapping is stable. Gating the workflow prevents a conclusion from being formed on an incomplete base, and makes the state of the review legible at any point in time.
Automated controls surface candidates; they do not conclude. A contradiction flagged by a control may reflect a genuine inconsistency in the file, or a limitation in the source material, or a legitimate explanation that exists outside the documents provided. Distinguishing between these is a judgement, and it is made by a reviewer.
This is why a file can carry the status Human review required. It is a real state of the workflow, not a placeholder.
A report that has not been locked is explicitly marked Not locked. Locking is the act that fixes the content of a deliverable and records its fingerprint, so that any later copy can be checked against the original. SHA-256 integrity recording is systematic and not optional.
WEETRA Organization is an independent methodological body. It is not a governmental body, regulatory agency, or competent body within the meaning of any EU regulation. Nothing on this page constitutes legal, tax, or compliance advice.
WEETRA does not provide certification, accredited verification, legal advice, customs representation or any guarantee of regulatory acceptance. Final decisions on the admissibility of data remain exclusively within the jurisdiction of competent authorities.